Dragon
Food: The Preposterous Obfuscation
The Two-headed Dragon, Part II
In our last blog: The two heads of this dragon kill both at home and abroad.
Here at home, crazed young men with assault weapons slaughter children and
movie audiences. Overseas, suicide bombers destroy hundreds of people at a
single stroke.
"Who will slay this two headed dragon and
how?
The metaphorical two-headed dragon
stalking us today is the creation of a Western religious culture that could
have made angels instead. Its origins
grew into a U. S. culture customarily understood to have begun with leaders like Puritan
John Winthrop who saw the vast new continent as a New Jerusalem, “a city set upon
a Hill.” The trust in this exceptional gift
soon permitted other exceptions: Native American removal, slave trading,
railroading leading to land monopolies, mining for private ownership of precious
metals.
Later, after Darwin, came Social
Darwinism—to justify cementing class and race distinctions and the “natural”
way a cooperative God would confirm separating the wheat from the chaff. People
who succeeded became exemplars of this natural selection in more recent centuries.
The faith communities very often adapted themselves to this comforting theology
that helped the nation accept segregation, discrimination, growing inequality and the preferential option of God for the
USA.
This has made what is attractive
about today’s very real, menacing, two-headed dragon: Morally dubious decisions by the powerful can
be masked as truth or patriotism; religion can be used as a love potion, a divine
anesthetic that exempts people from making
judgments about good and evil. Thus the Securities and Exchange Commission discussed
in this week’s news media has long practiced its version of exceptionalism. Giant
corporations or powerful business leaders found guilty of fraud are permitted
to wink. They are permitted to simply pay a fine but admit to no wrong doing.
So it has become common that instead
of identifying dragons, instead of perceiving the demonic forces at work in our
midst, faith communities can simply recite a litany of forgiveness, an insurance policy that promises anything and
everyone can be forgiven. Just so are budgets for churches, synagogues and
mosques raised, but much more so, a compliant and uncritical citizenry become accustomed
to accept foreign wars that slay millions and drone planes that deliver sudden
and summary death indiscriminately. It
is just so!
This amounts to a preposterous obfuscation—a
moral hypocrisy that the disadvantaged of the world have learned to hate. Devouring the opportunities
of tens of millions of unemployed Americans, our dragon’s dual heads also feed the
fury of destroyed and impoverished people around the world.
It’s not yet too late to cut off this monster’s food supply. The
timidity, the irresolution of faith traditions, grows from ambivalence about their own origins in movements of resistance:
The Hebrews resisting the power of Pharaoh and the culture of idols; Muhammad
resisting the tribal manipulations of polytheism that empowered them to
practice the slavery of debt imposition.
Jesus--commonly portrayed as the teacher of
love and forgiveness—offered little of either
to the Temple leaders or scribes and Pharisees who vied with one another for political power. He passed judgment on the religious-political
regimes that crushed people’s spirits, that linked illness with the guilt of
having broken the religious law, filling them with self-blame. He led a resistance movement against the monsters
of inequality, against the leprosy, blindness and death that were interpreted
as the sufferer’s just deserts.
These days, because a new generation
has been coming out of our universities and seminaries, there are reasons for
hope. They are still being asked to agree not
to disturb the peace, to stay in line, to not mix moral principle with
politics. Often very well educated, they show signs of the capacity to resist. There
is still time for them to disobey, to lead the fight to destroy the very real
two-headed dragon that threatens the future.
Their moral leadership cannot come a minute too soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment